September 21, 2013 15:05
Russia asks N. Korea to explain incident with Russian ship in Sea of Japan
MOSCOW. Sept 21 (Interfax) - The Russian Foreign Ministry is asking North Korea to explain the incident that occurred in the Sea of Japan on Friday, when the North Korean coastal guard stopped the Russian fishing vessel Altai.
"According to the information we have, a North Korean military ship, without making any contact, fired shots with automatic weapons and red signal rockets in the direction of the Russian vessel, after which it heaved aback. The North Korean military boarded the vessel, inspected the ship and questioned the captain. After that, the vessel was allowed to continue its voyage. No people aboard the ship were hurt, The vessel was not damaged," the Russian Foreign Ministry's press and information department said in a commentary posted on its website on Saturday.
"The Russian Foreign Ministry has asked the Koreans to explain this incident," the ministry said.
(Our editorial staff can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org)
January 24, 2017
SYRIAN GOVERNMENT READY TO SIT DOWN WITH OPPOSITION FOR SAVING COUNTRY - AL-JAAFARI
Syrian opposition hopes Russia will continue its involvement in establishing peace in Syria
Moscow, Tehran, Ankara to cooperate on Astana platform for settling Syria crisis - statement
Dadin's appeal with Russian Constitutional Court shall not be upheld - presidential envoy (Part 2)
Rosatom applies to bid in South African nuclear plant tender - Likhachev
Daily Headline News for January 24, 2017
NATO delegation arrives in Ukraine
Armenian PM brings new proposals on Russian capital involvement to Moscow
Official exchange rates for CIS and Baltic nations as of 24.01.2017
SOKOLOV: HEAD OF EGYPT'S AVIATION MINISTRY TO VISIT RUSSIA EARLY FEBRUARY, INCLUDING TO DISCUSS REINSTATING FLIGHTS
Guarantor countries acknowledge Syria's integrity, sovereignty - joint statement
LIKHACHEV: ROSATOM HAS APPLIED TO BID AT TENDER TO BUILD NUCLEAR POWER PLANT IN SOUTH AFRICA
Gazprom to seek reciprocal injunctions on OPAL to safeguard revenue (Part 2)