Subscription and demo access

About Interfax
Press Releases
Products & Services
Contact us
Customer Login


02/19 05:05   Russia political and economic calendar: February 19
02/18 23:11   Hague court ruling in favor of Yukos ex-shareholders is unjust - Slutsky
02/18 23:05   Entry to Russia for Chinese citizens to be suspended starting Feb 20 (Part 3)
02/18 22:57   Govt could be given powers to preserve traditional family values
02/18 22:52   Court ruling regarding Yukos should not be executed in Russia - Klishas
02/18 22:49   Austrian justice minister to decide on ex-official Mazo's extradition to Russia
02/18 22:43   Four candidates registered for post of RusAF president
02/18 22:40   All those quarantined near Tyumen test negative for coronavirus - authorities
02/18 22:34   Udaltsov appeals with ECHR Grand Chamber re small compensation in Bolotnaya case - lawyer

You can access a demo version of, recieve more information about or subscribe to Interfax publications by filling in and sending the form below.

First name:

Last name:







Please enter the digits in the box below:  |  Interviews  |  Vladimir Chizhov: EU must take into account other countries specifics and...


February 23, 2011

Vladimir Chizhov: EU must take into account other countries specifics and parameters

Russian Ambassador to the European Union Vladimir Chizhov has given an interview to Interfax ahead of the visit by a governmental delegation led by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin to Brussels.

Question: Vladimir Alexeyevich, a number of experts estimate that the energy issue will be the most poignant part of the EU-Russia negotiating process over the future basic agreement, as the third EU energy package is due to become effective. Is there any chance of a compromise on this issue?

Anwser: Certainly, there is. This has to be dealt with. This has to addressed. If you let everything drift away, there will be problems. Our energy companies, and not just Gazprom but others too, will have problems. There will be problems on the EU side as well. I can give you a specific example. Lithuania, an EU member, acting in the best traditions of revolutionary radicalism, is essentially heading towards the nationalization of its energy infrastructure. that is to say the gas pipeline owned by a consortium of Gazprom and a European company. They are expected to be left with just distribution networks. They say you cant have both. Actually, this breaking down itself is quite debatable.

All this has to be addressed, and this is not just the energy sector. In principle, this is a reflection of a broader approach, in which I see a long-term problem both in our relations with the European Union and its relations with other countries. I am talking here not only to EU officials but to their other partners as well: Americans, the Chinese, Indians, the Japanese, the Norwegians, the Swiss and so on. The problem is that the European Union, apart from its conviction that everything it produces in this world represents the best global standard, also shows a persistent tendency to apply this standard to the rest of the world.

For instance, civil aircraft exhaust emissions. Carbon dioxide emissions in excess of the EU quotas will have to be acquired by airline companies for money. Well, this probably could be discussed in the context of global efforts to fight global warming, but not unilaterally. If the situation does not change, Russia will have to retaliate. Then the fees for Trans-Siberian flights of European aircraft will appear only half of the problem. Because then it will be a question of billions of euros for flights over the Russian airspace.

Or take another standard, wood packaging, which is due to become effective in the future. Any wooden object, including a wooden box, a crate, must have a certificate of conformity to ecological standards valid for two weeks. It might do for Europe. But if you pack something in a wooden box in Krasnoyarsk and send it to Germany, for example. It will take more than two weeks for this box just to reach the Russian border.

The specifics and parameters of other states must be taken into account. And there is work to be done on all that.

Q.: Recently the European Union has repeatedly voiced grievances over air transportation agreements signed between a number of EU member states and Russia.

A.: Most EU countries already have this problem. The majority of European Union member states were formally warned by the European Commission that unless they change bilateral agreements with third countries, not only with Russia, they will be sued at the European court. The European Commission would sometimes sue its member states. Sometimes it would win, sometimes it would lose.

In this particular case it is a problem of renouncing the notion of "national carrier" and switching to the notion of an "EU carrier." We agree to discuss this matter. But it should be a subject of negotiations and not unilateral decisions. These talks must be held with the member states and the European Commission under a unified European template. Russian Transport Minister Igor Levitin, who is coming to Brussels as part of the Russian governmental delegation, is due to meet with his partner Siim Kallas, member of the European Transport Commission, on Wednesday evening. Their agenda includes precisely these problems.

Q.: There is also a foreign policy division in these consultations between the EU and Russian executive authorities. Has there been any progress in efforts to set up a foreign policy and security committee?

A.: I think the upcoming meeting between Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Viktorovich Lavrov and EU High Representative on Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton as part of the visit by the Russian governmental delegation will facilitate progress in this matter.

Q.: Observers from the EU mission in Georgia are demanding access to Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

A.: This is a matter for Abkhazians and South Ossetians, who have not been asked.

Q.: And how do you assess the work of the EU mission in Kosovo?

A.: This is not an easy question. First of all, the functions of this mission are not outlined quite clearly. Objectively, of course, this mission representing the whole European Union, in which five of the 27 members have not recognized Kosovo, has a limited space for maneuvering. Besides, we believe that attempts to oust the UN mission are counterproductive. Under the UN Security Council resolution N 1244 of 1999 that no one has repealed, Kosovo remains under the United Nations jurisdiction. The fact that today Kosovo is recognized by about 70 countries does not change the matter. They are still a minority within the international community. They are one third of UN members. As regards the efficiency of this mission, there are various points of view. The Serbian authorities have grievances against it and reprimands for a unilateral approach. There are problems with this mission.

Q.: What can you tell about EU sanctions against Belarus?

A.: From the point of view of international law, they are not sanctions. By international law, sanctions can only be imposed by the UN Security Council. Sanctions were imposed against Iran, but restrictive measures were adopted with regard to Belarus. This is counterproductive, in principle. Any measures aimed at isolating a state, be it Belarus or any other country, are counterproductive, and certainly we do not support them. No, we do not like everything that is going on in Belarus either. And we are saying it openly, including in straightforward conversations with our Belarusian colleagues and friends. But restrictive measures are not the right path to follow.

Q.: European partners of the Russian governmental delegation as set to raise the issue about the second trial against Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Platon Lebedev, as well as the lawyer Sergei Magnitsky case, as part of the legal agenda.

A.: I think these issues will be outlined, though not as urgent matters. I was asked before about the European Parliament resolution on Russia. The European Parliament is making very many resolutions. None of them is legally binding for enforcement structures. While the Lisbon Treaty has strengthened the competence of the European Parliament, their own ideas about their own competence have increased in a geometric progression.


New U.S. Ambassador to Russia John Sullivan, who has recently started his mission in Moscow, has given an interview to Interfax in which he speaks about priorities of his work and assesses the prospects of developing bilateral relations.

The En+ Group effectively turned a new page in its corporate history in 2019. Now the group has a unique governance scheme for Russia - without a domineering shareholder and a loyal majority on the board of directors. The board chairman, Lord Gregory Barker, is convinced that the changes adopted in the framework of the plan he devised to get the company removed from the U.S. sanctions list will ultimately do the company and its shareholders good, irrespective of the deal with OFAC. Lord Barker told Interfax in an interview about the work of the new En+ board, dividends and long-term strategy.

Ambassador of the United Kingdom to Russia Laurie Bristow, who is leaving his post, has given an exclusive interview to Interfax in which he speaks about prospects of relations with Russia, arms control, the situation in Syria and surrounding Iran, as well as other topical problems on the international agenda.

Cooperation between OPEC and non-OPEC countries, foremost Russia, has lasted for three years already and in this time the oil market has seen shakeups that have threatened to cause a split within OPEC and jeopardized the fate of the OPEC+ agreement to curb oil production in order to balance the market. OPEC Secretary General Mohammed Barkindo spoke with Interfax on the sidelines of the 16th annual meeting of the Valdai Club in Sochi about how decisions are made and OPECs position regarding geopolitical events that have hit oil markets.

U.S. Ambassador to Russia John Huntsman, who will leave his post in early October, has given an interview to Interfax in which he speaks about exchanges at the highest level between Moscow and Washington, a possibility of Russias return to G8, as well as his vision of the future of U.S.-Russian relations.

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov has given an interview to Interfax in which he speaks about the U.S. withdrawal from the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty on that is expected on August 2, about Russia‘s response to the U.S. and NATO possible deployment of missiles banned by the treaty, and about whether the Cuban Missile Crisis may repeat itself.

German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov will hold negotiations on the sidelines of the Petersburg Dialogue forum in Germany on Thursday. Maas has given an interview to Interfax ahead of the forum, in which he speaks about prospects of settling the conflict in Ukraine, Germanys preparations for ensuring security in the absence of the INF Treaty and attempts to save the Iranian nuclear deal.


 ©   1991—2020   "Interfax News Agency" JSC. All rights reserved.
Contact information   |   Privacy Policy   |   Interfax offices   |   made by web.finmarket

News and other data on this site are provided for information purposes only, and are not intended for republication or redistribution. Republication or redistribution of Interfax content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Interfax.

Browse other Interfax sites:   |   IFX.RU   |   Interfax Group   Rambler's Top100